Search archive

7 results for "judicial nominees"

• TRUMP'S THIRD TERM: WHAT BLANCHE DIDN'T SAY

  Shane Vaughn2026-05-20Series: TOTO TONIGHT PODCAST

  Top matches in this teaching

  • …che. When Senator Chris Coons questioned Trump's judicial nominees a couple weeks back, he asked them a simple question. "Is President Trump eligible to ru…

    Copy paragraphRead this section

  • … no matter who's in the Oval Office? What if the judicial nominees who can't quite remember the 22nd Amendment... get confirmed? What if — and now we're re…

    Copy paragraphRead this section

  • …te one month before the next inauguration. I see judicial nominees who won't affirm the most settled piece of constitutional law since the $1.776 billion …

    Copy paragraphRead this section

  constitutional lawexecutive powerpresidential authorityexecutive governmentconstitutional enforcement

  Copy paragraphRead more

  Opens this sermon and jumps to your highlighted search term when transcript text is available.

• BREAKING: TRUMP JUST CALLED FOR THE NUCLEAR OPTION IN THE SENATE !!!!

  Shane Vaughn2025-10-31NoneSeries: N/A

  Top matches in this teaching

  • …a mandate. He’s got a mission. He’s got a list of judicial nominees that would make the Founding Fathers proud. And at the top of that list? Neil Gorsuch — …

    Copy paragraphRead this section
• Borrowed Bases - The Book

  Professor Toto2026-05-09Series: Standalone Book

  worse. 109 “Reforms” that actually strengthened two-party monopoly: 1. Primary Elections (introduced 1890s-1920s): Theory: Let people choose nominees instead of party bosses (good!) Reality: • Primaries are expensive, requiring party infrastructure • Made parties even more important ... response would be: Pack it more when we take power Judicial Filibusters: 2013: Democrats eliminate filibuster for lower court nominees (Reid) 2017: Republicans eliminate filibuster for Supreme Court nominees (Mc- Connell) Future: Complete elimination of legislative filibuster increasingly dis- cussed

  Copy paragraph
• BLUE SLIP OR PINK SLIP?

  Shane Vaughn2025-07-29Mark 7:13Series: N/A

  Senate Judiciary Committee’s Blue Slip tradition as an informal custom that allows home-state senators to obstruct federal judicial and U.S. Attorney nominations. It argues that the practice is neither required by the Constitution nor established ... legitimate constitutional authority. He urges Senator Chuck Grassley and Republican leaders to end the practice, confirm President Trump’s nominees, and restore the constitutional appointment process, warning that voters may deliver their political “pink slips” in 2026 if they refuse

  home-state senators
• Toto Tonight Script 3/3/26

  Professor Toto2026-03-03Series: TOTO TONIGHT PODCAST

  This has been done before. 2013 --- Senate Democrats killed the filibuster for executive and judicial nominations. 2017 --- Senate Republicans extended it to cover Supreme Court nominees. It has been done. It CAN be done again. TOTO: Vance has the will

  Copy paragraphRead more

  Opens this sermon and jumps to your highlighted search term when transcript text is available.

• 2026 Midterms: PART II — THE PANIC MACHINE & THE SABOTEURS

  Shane Vaughn2025-11-25NoneSeries: N/A

  The article contends that the Democratic Party is sustained by political messaging

  rino republicansvoter apathy
• Professor Toto - Teaches you how DUMB Jack Smith Is

  Professor Toto2023-08-031 Samuel 17:26, 45–50Series: N/A

  In this commentary, Professor Toto attacks Special Counsel Jack Smith’s legal

  constitutional rightsjack smith

…a mandate. He’s got a mission. He’s got a list of judicial nominees that would make the Founding Fathers proud. And at the top of that list? Neil Gorsuch — …

Opens this sermon and jumps to your highlighted search term when transcript text is available.